Are there any good reviews for Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six® Siege X?
Summary
Q.Are there any good reviews for Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six® Siege X?
A.Yes — several professional outlets gave Rainbow Six Siege X generally favorable reviews (Metacritic aggregates a Metascore around 79), though player feedback is mixed and reports of bugs, cheating, and falling concurrent numbers have tempered community reception.
More info
Yes — there are good professional reviews for Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X: critic coverage is generally favorable, with Metacritic showing a Metascore in the high 70s and outlets like GamesRadar+ praising the overhaul, improved onboarding and the new Dual Front mode as meaningful evolutions to the formula. See the aggregated results on the Metacritic page and GamesRadar+’s full review for specifics on what critics liked. (metacritic.com)
That said, the reception isn’t uniformly positive: user reviews are mixed and several outlets and community reports note issues since the free-to-play transition — complaints about matchmaking, cheaters, audio/visual choices and stability have been raised even as Ubisoft pushes Siege X’s broader accessibility. Coverage of player-count declines and the developer’s response to cheating gives useful context if you’re weighing critics’ praise against live-player experience; for an explainer on the F2P change and editions see coverage of the rollout. (metacritic.com)
